exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 RSS Feed

CVE-2011-3009

Status Candidate

Overview

Ruby before 1.8.6-p114 does not reset the random seed upon forking, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to predict the values of random numbers by leveraging knowledge of the number sequence obtained in a different child process, a related issue to CVE-2003-0900.

Related Files

Red Hat Security Advisory 2012-0070-01
Posted Jan 30, 2012
Authored by Red Hat | Site access.redhat.com

Red Hat Security Advisory 2012-0070-01 - Ruby is an extensible, interpreted, object-oriented, scripting language. It has features to process text files and to do system management tasks. A denial of service flaw was found in the implementation of associative arrays in Ruby. An attacker able to supply a large number of inputs to a Ruby application that are used as keys when inserting data into an array could trigger multiple hash function collisions, making array operations take an excessive amount of CPU time. To mitigate this issue, randomization has been added to the hash function to reduce the chance of an attacker successfully causing intentional collisions.

tags | advisory, denial of service, ruby
systems | linux, redhat
advisories | CVE-2011-3009, CVE-2011-4815
SHA-256 | 03b3e4cae76347af80bc92c207769ad0a2a84889ef025d717522605f2284e476
Red Hat Security Advisory 2011-1581-03
Posted Dec 6, 2011
Authored by Red Hat | Site access.redhat.com

Red Hat Security Advisory 2011-1581-03 - Ruby is an extensible, interpreted, object-oriented, scripting language. It has features to process text files and to do system management tasks. It was found that Ruby did not reinitialize the PRNG after forking a child process. This could eventually lead to the PRNG returning the same result twice. An attacker keeping track of the values returned by one child process could use this flaw to predict the values the PRNG would return in other child processes. A flaw was found in the Ruby SecureRandom module. When using the SecureRandom.random_bytes class, the PRNG state was not modified after forking a child process. This could eventually lead to SecureRandom.random_bytes returning the same string more than once. An attacker keeping track of the strings returned by one child process could use this flaw to predict the strings SecureRandom.random_bytes would return in other child processes.

tags | advisory, ruby
systems | linux, redhat
advisories | CVE-2011-2705, CVE-2011-3009
SHA-256 | 766668de266f9a5e422759c80977180b1e7d1da61b84b183a2a86e73c010afd6
Page 1 of 1
Back1Next

File Archive:

June 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    Jun 1st
    0 Files
  • 2
    Jun 2nd
    0 Files
  • 3
    Jun 3rd
    18 Files
  • 4
    Jun 4th
    21 Files
  • 5
    Jun 5th
    0 Files
  • 6
    Jun 6th
    57 Files
  • 7
    Jun 7th
    6 Files
  • 8
    Jun 8th
    0 Files
  • 9
    Jun 9th
    0 Files
  • 10
    Jun 10th
    12 Files
  • 11
    Jun 11th
    27 Files
  • 12
    Jun 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    Jun 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    Jun 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    Jun 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    Jun 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    Jun 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    Jun 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    Jun 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    Jun 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    Jun 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    Jun 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    Jun 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    Jun 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    Jun 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    Jun 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    Jun 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    Jun 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    Jun 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    Jun 30th
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close